Hopkins v. Schulte et al
| Larry Hopkins |
| Conrad Schulte and Keane Thummel Trucking, Inc. |
| 5:2024cv00036 |
| February 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Matthew A Stinnett |
| Robert E Wier |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice by Keane Thummel Trucking, Inc., Conrad Schulte. (Sizemore, Chad) |
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: 1. The parties shall exchange any information req'd by Rule 26(a)(1) NLT 3/8/2024; 2. The parties shall immediately assess the potential for agreed case resolution and should continue to make that assessment as litigation persists; 3. The parties shall make any motions to amend pleadings or join additional parties NLT 6/10/2024; 4. Parties shall complete all fact discovery NLT 3/10/2025; 5. TELEPHONE CONFERENCE set for 11/4/2024 at 10:00 AM in LEXINGTON before Magistrate Judge Matthew A. Stinnett to discuss discovery progress; 6. Identity of expert witnesses and reports to be disclosed by Ptff NLT 11/8/2024 and by Def NLT 1/7/2025; 7. Parties to complete all expert discovery NLT 3/10/2025; 8. Parties shall file all dispositive and Daubert motions NLT 4/9/2025; 9. Discovery disputes shall be resolved as set forth in Paragraph 5 of Judge Wier's Standing Case Management and Referral Order; 10. Motion practice shall be governed by Local Rule 7.1 except as otherwise provided in this order; 11. The Court builds the case schedule based on party input. Modification of this schedule thus is disfavored and will occur only under the standards and mechanics of Rule 16 and/or Rule 6, as applicable; 12. Upon resolution of any summary judgment motion, or expiration of the deadline to file the same, the Court will set any additional deadlines as necessary at that time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew A. Stinnett on 2/28/2024.(KMP)cc: COR,D
|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Matthew A. Stinnett for review: #10 RESPONSE (KMP) |
| Filing 10 JOINT RESPONSE TO #9 Order to Supplement Rule 26(f) Joint Report filed by Larry Hopkins, Conrad Schulte and Keane Thummel Trucking, Inc.. (Mendiondo, Adrian) Modified to add filers on 2/26/2024 (KMP). |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: the parties are to SUPPLEMENT their 26(f) Joint Report NLT 2/23/2024. The supplement should and specifically describe the basis for the length of their proposed schedule w/ sufficient detail for the Court to assess that schedule and its progression, particularly the discovery and dispositive motions deadlines. If such bias and detail is not provided, the Court will shorten the timeline provided by the parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew A. Stinnett on 2/14/2024. (KMP) cc: COR
|
| Filing 8 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Conrad Schulte, Larry Hopkins, Keane Thummel Trucking, Inc. (Mendiondo, Adrian) Modified to add filers on 2/12/2024 (KMP). |
| Filing 7 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Larry Hopkins. (Mendiondo, Adrian) |
| Filing 6 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Conrad Schulte. (Sizemore, Chad) |
| Filing 5 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Keane Thummel Trucking, Inc.. (Sizemore, Chad) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Chad M. Sizemore. #1 Notice of Removal, has been filed by Keane Thummel Trucking, Inc. without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (KMP) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND REFERRAL ORDER: 1. At the outset, the Court reminds the parties that, under Rule 1, they share with the Court the duty to construe, administer, and employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action; 2. Pursuant to 28:636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court refers this case to the appropriate United States Magistrate Judge for this Division; 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court retains for decision any motion dispositive of a claim or defense (as well as motions regulating the trial proof, including Daubert and motions in limine); 4. Concurrent with the filing of any Rule 12 motion, the moving party may file, as a separate motion, any request for a discovery stay pending resolution. The Court refers consideration of any such motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge; 5. Discovery Disputes shall be resolved as defined within this order; The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter this Standing Order in the undersigned's civil cases excepting Social Security, pro se, and prisoner post-conviction matters at case opening (or as the Court otherwise directs). Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 11/13/2019.(KMP)cc: COR
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Fayette Circuit Court, case number 21-CI-131. ( Filing fee $405; receipt number AKYEDC-5764288), filed by Conrad Schulte, Keane Thummel Trucking, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Record, #3 Notice of N.O.R.)(KMP) |
| Conflict Check run. (KMP) |
| ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Keane Thummel Trucking, Inc., Conrad Schulte. FILED IN STATE COURT RECORD. SEE #1 . (KMP) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Matthew A. Stinnett for review: #1 Notice of Removal, Answer to Complaint (KMP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
