Woods v. Detective Rawlings et al
| Maceo Woods |
| Detective Rawlings, Lawson, Gaby, Burden, Gray, Purvis, Teddy Rowens, Michael Sanquiqni and Bluegrass Drug Task Force |
| 5:2024cv00052 |
| February 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Danny C Reeves |
| P SO |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: 1. Pursuant to the doctrine announced in Younger v. Harris, the Court ABSTAINS from further evaluating or adjudicating Woods' Amended Complaint #6 at this time; 2. This matter is STAYED for the pendency of Woods' state court criminal proceedings; and 3. Every 90 days, Woods must file a Status Report explaining the status of his state criminal case and whether his criminal charges remain pending or have been resolved, and if resolved, the nature of the resolution. Failure to provide timely status reports providing the information requested may result in the Amended Complaint being dismissed. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 3/6/2024.(STC)cc: COR and Maceo Woods by US Mail
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: 1. granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; fee is deferred; clerk send form and this order to jailer/warden and the OGC for the DOC in Frankfort, KY. 2. Woods advise of any change of address. Matter stands submitted. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 3/4/24. (JLM)cc: COR,FIN and Woods by US Mail
|
|
Filing 8
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Maceo Woods, pro se. (KCF)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Maceo Woods, pro se.Motions referred to P SO. (KCF)
|
|
Filing 6
AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Maceo Woods, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Envelope PM 2-27-24)(KCF)
|
|
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Complaint, ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Maceo Woods (KCF)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: denying w/o prejudice #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Clerk mark forms and send to Woods. If Woods intends to pursue his claims, he must complete and file complaint form. Woods must either pay the $405 filing fee or have Certificate of inmate acct certified by prison staff, complete aff and file docs w/Court. Woods must take steps outlined w/in 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 2/22/24. (JLM)cc: COR and Woods (w/foms) by US Mail
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Maceo Woods, pro se.Motions referred to P SO. (KCF)
|
|
Filing 3
IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(KCF)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED), filed by Maceo Woods, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Envelope PM 2-16-24)(KCF)
|
|
Conflict Check run. (KCF)
|
|
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Complaint, ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Maceo Woods (KCF)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
