Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ephraim McDowell Health, Inc.
| Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| Ephraim McDowell Health, Inc. |
| 5:2024cv00084 |
| March 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Karen K Caldwell |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Ephraim McDowell Health, Inc. waiver sent on 4/1/2024, answer due 5/31/2024. (Bryant, Jonathan) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth S. Muyskens on behalf of Ephraim McDowell Health, Inc. (Muyskens, Elizabeth) |
| Clerk's Note: Re #4 Notice to Attorney. Clerk docketed in error. Attorney may disregard. (KCF) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY Brandon A. Skates by Clerk re: L.R. 83 - Attorney Admission procedures w/ a copy of L.R. 83.1 and 83.2 (Attachments: #1 LR 83.1 & 83.2 Admission Packet)(KCF) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ephraim McDowell Health, Inc. and returned to counsel electronically for service. (KCF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: #1 Summons Ephraim McDowell Health, Inc, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KCF) |
| Conflict Check run. (KCF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
