Wolf v. Gregory et al
||Eric C. Wolf
||L. Gregory, K. Bennett Baker, Mr. Spaulding, Michael Basserman, B.C. Trent, B.T. Lowry and M.A. Bryant
||March 17, 2008
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
|| Pro Se
||Gregory F. Van Tatenhove
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
|Cause of Action:
||42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 24, 2009
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Wolf's motion for leave to file an amended complaint 10 is GRANTED. Clerk of the court shall file the tendered Amended complaint into the record in this action. 2) Civil rights claims asserted against Dfts Grego ry; Baker; Spaulding; Basserman; Trent: Lowry and Bryant are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 3) Clerk of the Court is directed to substitute the USA as the sole Dft w/respect to the claims. 4) Deputy Clerk in the London Clerk's Office shall prepare do cs necessary for service. 5) Deputy Clerk shall prepare a "Service Packet" consisting of the a)summons; b) complaint; c) The order granting IFP status; d) this order; and e) USM 285 Form; 6) Service upon the USA shall be made by sending a S ervice packet by certified or registered mail to USA for the EDKY and Atty General; 7) The London Clerk shall send the service packet for each identified dft by certified mail to the USM office in Lexington, Kentucky. Deputy Clerk shall enter the CMR into the record and note in the docket the date that the Service Packet was delivered to the USM Office. 8) The USM Office shall serve a Service Packet upon each identified dft in the manner described in step six above. 9) Within 40 days of the DOE of this Order, the USM Office shall send a Service Report to the London Clerk's Office, which will be filed in the record. 10) Pla shall immediately advise the London Clerk's Office of any change in his or her current mailing address. 11) Pla must communicate with the Court solely thru notices or motions filed w/the London Clerk's Office. Court will disregard correspondence sent directly to the Judge's Chambers. 12) With every notice or motion filed with the court, the Pla must a) mail a copy to each dft and b) certify that he has mailed a copy to each dft and the date on which this was done. Court will disregard any notice of motion which does not include this certification. Signed by Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 3/24/09.(MRS)cc: COR Modified on 3/24/2009 to indicate this document was mailed to the Pro Se Party via US Mail. (MRS)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?