Webb et al v. Stewart et al
| Mary Webb and Mary Jo Webb |
| F. Allen Lewis, Gerald L. Greene, Greene & Lewis, PLLC, Greene & Lewis and Frank W. Stewart |
| Frank W. Stewart |
| 6:2009cv00389 |
| November 19, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| London Office |
| Bell |
| Amul R. Thapar |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: ORDERED that the motion by the plaintiff's attorneys to enforce an attorney's lien against the defendant, R. 105 , is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion to intervene as a party to enforce the attorn ey's lien is DENIED AS MOOT. The motion is GRANTED for an attorney's lien of $131,684.66, the amount owed under the contingency fee arrangement. The motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for an attorney's lien of $5,913.17 and & #036;12,258.30, the amounts in fees and expenses allegedly incurred since the parties settled. If the plaintiff's attorneys wish to seek a lien forthese additional amounts, they shall have until December 6, 2011, to submit a detailed accounting of all other fees and expenses so the Court can evaluate their reasonableness. This accounting may be submitted ex parte if it contains privileged information. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 11/23/2011.(RBB)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
