Burkhart v. USA
Petitioner: Christopher Burkhart
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 6:2010cv07119
Filed: April 21, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: London Office
County: Laurel
Presiding Judge: Danny C. Reeves
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Deft Burkhart's motion to vacate his sentence is DENIED. 2) Recommended disposition of Mag. Judge is ADOPTED. 3) Burkhart's objections to recommended disposition are OVERRULED. 4) This habeas proceeding shall be DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the docket.. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 10/9/11.(SWA)cc: COR, deft-copy by mail
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burkhart v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Christopher Burkhart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?