Monday v. Hogsten
Petitioner: Alan Eugene Monday
Respondent: Karen Hogsten
Case Number: 6:2011cv00069
Filed: March 3, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: London Office
County: Clay
Presiding Judge: PSO
Presiding Judge: Karl S. Forester
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. The Clerk of the Court shall let the docket reflect ALLEN EUGENE MONDAY as an alias designation for the petitioner. 2. Mondays petition for a writ of habeas corpus [R. 2 ] is DENIED.3. The Court will enter an appropriate judgment. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 5/21/12.(SYD)cc: COR, mailed to pro se filer
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Monday v. Hogsten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Karen Hogsten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Alan Eugene Monday
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?