Mercury Development, LLC et al v. Motel Sleepers, Inc.
| Eagle Realty & Development, LLC and Mercury Development, LLC |
| Motel Sleepers, Inc. |
| 6:2011cv00147 |
| May 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| London Office |
| Pulaski |
| Gregory F. VanTatenhove |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) MSI's Motion to Reconsider [R. 39 ] is GRANTED, and as a result, MSI's Motion for Summary Judgment [R. 30 ] on its Counterclaim for Attorney's Fees is also GRANTED; (2) The Court will enter an appropriate Judgment contemporaneously herewith. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 09/25/2013.(KJA)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Defendant Motel Sleepers, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment R. 30 is GRANTED as to all claims against it brought by Plaintiffs Mercury Development, LLC and Eagle Realty & Development, LLC; and (2) Defendan t Motel Sleepers, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment R. 30 on its counterclaim is DENIED and notice pursuant to Rule 56(f)(1) is provided above. (3) The dates for the Final Pretrial Conference and Trial are SET ASIDE pending final resolution of Motel Sleepers, Inc.'s Counterclaim. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 02/11/2013.(KJA)cc: COR, London Court Diary, Jury Clerk
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
