Petro et al v. Jones et al
| Michael Petro, Teena Petro, Brandon Petro, Kimberly Petro, K.P., M.P. and C.P. |
| Benjamin Jones, Auto-Owners Insurance Co., Erie Insurance Co. and Celina Mutual Insurance Co. |
| Benjamin Jones |
| Erie Insurance Co. |
| 6:2011cv00151 |
| May 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| London Office |
| Wayne |
| Gregory F. VanTatenhove |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
192
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Court being sufficiently advised, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Petros' Motion for Sanctions [R. 144 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 3/12/2014.(MRS)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
141
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: The Court being sufficiently advised, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petroes' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [R. 120 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 05/01/2013. Motions terminated: 120 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by C.P., K.P., M.P., Brandon Petro, Kimberly Petro, Michael Petro, Teena Petro filed by K.P., Teena Petro, C.P., Michael Petro, Kimberly Petro, M.P., Brandon Petro.(MRS)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
133
MEMORANDUM, OPINION AND ORDER: (1) Jones' Motion for Order Compelling Full Release and Dismissal with Prejudice [R. 59 is DENIED; (2) The Petroes' Motion for Declaration of Rights Regarding Underinsured Motorists Insurance Coverages [ R. 63 is DENIED. (3) Erie and Celina's Motions for Declaratory Judgment [R. 64 , R. 65 are GRANTED; (4) Auto-Owners' Motion for Declaratory Summary Judgment on Coverage [R. 66] is DENIED; and (5) The Petroes' Motion to Amend [R . 78 is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part. The Petroes are permitted to amend their complaint to add claims of common law bad faith, and the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to file the amended complaint in accordance with this Memorandum Opinio n and Order; Finally, the PRIORITY OF COVERAGE provided under the relevant insurance policies is as follows: (1) Auto-Owners' UIM Policy, with a single limit of $500,000.00; (2) Auto-Owners Umbrella Policy, with a single limit of $1 ,000,000.00 for all Plaintiffs;(3) Erie's UIM Policy and Celina's UIM Policy will provide EXCESS COVERAGE to the Petroes. Erie's UIM Policy, with limits of $250,000.00/$500,000.00, for Michael and Teena Petro. Celinas UIM P olicy, with limits of $100,000.00/ $300,000.00, for Brandon and Kimberly Petro and their three children. Erie and Celina shall pay benefits amounts to the Petroes in accordance with the SET-OFF provisions of their polices. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 02/27/2013. (MRS)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
