Everett v. Ives
Petitioner: Derrick Edward Everett
Respondent: R. Ives
Case Number: 6:2011cv00180
Filed: June 29, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: London Office
County: McCreary
Presiding Judge: PSO
Presiding Judge: Henry R. Wilhoit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Petition for writ of h/c is DENIED; 2) Clerk direct to send copy of MOO to current address of record for Everett and to Everett at his current BOP address (Oklahoma City); 3) Jgm shall be entered; 4) Action is STRICKEN from the docket. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 6/13/2012.(MRS)cc: COR, Pro Se Filer at both addresses as directed by order
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Everett v. Ives
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: R. Ives
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Derrick Edward Everett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?