Thrower v. USA et al
William Thrower |
USA, Bureau of Prisons and Warden of USP McCreary |
6:2011cv00285 |
October 19, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
London Office |
XX US, Outside State |
PSO |
Gregory F. VanTatenhove |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Throwers Complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-80, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. This proceeding is STRICKEN from the Courts active docket. 3. The Court will enter an appropriate judgment. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 10/28/2014.(JMB)cc: COR, William Thrower via US Mail |
Filing 13 ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Pltf's motions to proceed w/out full prepymt of fees & costs 7 & 10 GRANTED.; 2. Any & all claims involving events that took place while pltf was incarc @ USP McCreary... are SEVERED from this actio n & TRANSFERRED to USDC for Eastern Dist of Kentucky.; 3. Ct will RETAIN jurisdiction of claims that USP Lewisburg employees knowingly placed him in cell w/ dangerous inmate & that he rec'd negligent med care during incarc @ USP Lewisburg. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 10/19/11. (ki) [Transferred from pamd on 10/19/2011.] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.