Lundy v. USA
Petitioner: Andre Deshawn Lundy
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 6:2011cv07168
Filed: May 17, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: London Office
County: Knox
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Wier
Presiding Judge: Danny C. Reeves
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. adopting #108 Report and Recommendations as to Andre Deshawn Lundy (2); 2. denying 97 Motion to Vacate (2255) as to Andre Deshawn Lundy (2); 3. A Certificate of Appealability shall not issue ; 4. Judgment will be entered contemporaneously with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 3/19/12.(SYD)cc: COR, mailed to pro se filer
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lundy v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Andre Deshawn Lundy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?