Morris v. Meko
Petitioner: Jeffery A. Morris
Respondent: Joseph Meko
Case Number: 6:2012cv00004
Filed: January 10, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: London Office
County: Pulaski
Presiding Judge: Hanly A. Ingram
Presiding Judge: Gregory F. VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Petitioner's objections to the R/R 9 are OVERRULED; 2) MJ's R/R 8 is ADOPTED as and for the opinion of this Court; 3) Petitioner's 2254 petition 1 is DISMISSED W/PREJUDICE; 4) A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED; 5) Jgm in favor of Rsp will be entered.. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 09/30/2015.(MRS)cc: COR, Pro Se filer
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morris v. Meko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jeffery A. Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Joseph Meko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?