Goodin et al v. Knox County, Kentucky et al
| Joseph Goodin and Tabitha Goodin |
| Mary Hammons, Bill Mills, John Doe(s), Knox County, Kentucky, Knox County Jail and J. M. Hall |
| 6:2012cv00018 |
| January 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| London Office |
| Knox |
| Gregory F. VanTatenhove |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Dft's Motion for Summary Judgment [R. 33 ] is GRANTED for all federal and state claims brought against all Dfts; 2. In light of the Court's grant of summary judgment to Defendants on all of Plfs' claim s, the Plfs' request for declaratory and injunctive relief is denied as moot; 3. Given the Court's previous denial of Plfs' motion to amend the Complaint [R. 29 ], the Defendants John Doe(s), as Employees/Officers of Knox County Deten tion Center, as well as all other Defendants in this case, are hereby DISMISSED from this action; 4. The Final Pretrial Conference scheduled for June 30, 2014, and the Jury Trial scheduled for July 14, 2014, are CANCELLED; 5. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE ORDER and there is no just cause for delay; and 6. The Court will enter an appropriate judgment contemporaneously herewith. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 6/16/2014.(RBB)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER:(1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [R. 5 ] is GRANTED with respect to federal claims against individual Defendants in their official capacities and as to Knox County Detention Center; (2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [R. 5 ] is GRANTED with respect to state claims against Knox County, Knox County Detention Center, and individual Defendants in their official capacities; (3) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [R. 5 ] is GRANTED with respect to Bill Mi lls, in both his official and individual capacities; (4) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [R. 5 ] is DENIED with respect to Plaintiffs' claims for injunctive relief against Defendants in their official capacities; (5) Defendants' Moti on to Dismiss [R. 5 ] is GRANTED with respect to a federal claim for punitive damages against Knox County; (6) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [R. 5 ] is DENIED with respect to federal and state claims for punitive damages against individual Defendants in their individual capacities; (7) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [R. 5 ] is DENIED with respect to the argument that an indispensable party has not been joined; and (8) Defendants' Objection [R. 10 ] to Plaintiffs' sur-reply [R. 9 ], construed as a motion to strike, is GRANTED. Signed by Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 5/3/2012.(RBB)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
