Stanford v. USA
| Matthew Stanford |
| USA |
| 6:2012cv00093 |
| May 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| London Office |
| Knox |
| Amul R. Thapar |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
390
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: 1) By Friday, January 15, 2016, the government shall respond to this order with its factual and legal basis for suing Mr. Macon; 2) Clerk of Court shall serve this order on Mr. Macon at his address. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 12/28/2015.(RC)cc: COR, paper copy to Jimmy Macon
|
|
Filing
191
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: A hearing to resolve outstanding disputes over jurisdictional facts relevant to the DFE is SCHEDULED for Monday, July 28, 2014, at 1:00 p.m., at the United States Courthouse in Covington, Kentucky. The parties should be prepared to address the following questions, with support from any relevant documents, witnesses, or other exhibits and competent proof they choose to introduce:1) Was MSG Charles Kenneth Miles in Title 10 or Title 32 status whe n he built the zip line? 2)Assuming the plff's allegations regarding the conduct of HLDTC staff are true, did that conduct violate any unwritten mandatory (nondiscretionary) federal policy regarding fall protection, identification and supervision of visitors or any other topic? a) Whether any such policy is federal or state and b) Whether any such policy is mandatory or merely an advisory guideline. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 6/9/2014.(RC)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
163
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) The government's motion to dismiss, R. 108 , is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2) By Monday, February 10, 2014, the United States shall file a renewed 12(b)(1) motion with additional briefing as detai led in the Memorandum Order. 3) Plaintiffs Stanford and KACo shall RESPOND no later than Monday, February 24, 2014, addressing all of the same questions. 4) The United States may file a REPLY to the plaintiffs' responses no later than Monday, March 3, 2014. 5) Stanford's two motions to strike, R. 123 and R. 124 , are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 1/21/14.(SYD)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stanford v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Matthew Stanford | |
| Represented By: | William J. Driscoll |
| Represented By: | Christopher P. Evensen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
