Barbourville Diagnostic Imaging Center v. Philips Medical Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: Barbourville Diagnostic Imaging Center
Defendant: Philips Medical Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2012cv00191
Filed: September 7, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: London Office
County: Knox
Presiding Judge: Gregory F. VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 51 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Defendant's motion for summary judgment with respect to (1) Plaintiff's breach of contract claims and (2) its own breach of contract counterclaim is GRANTED; 2. Defendant's motion for summary judgment w ith respect to its unjust enrichment counterclaim is DENIED; 3. The Court DIRECTS the parties to enter a proposed agreed order within (60) days of the entry of this Order containing an agreed upon calculation of damages. If the parties cannot reach an agreement within this time period, the Court further DIRECTS the parties to file a status report prior to the expiration of the deadline; and 4. Because no triable issues remain, the parties' Joint Motion for Continuance of Trial and Pretrial Conference [R. 50] is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 2/19/16. (MRS)cc: COR, JC, Diary
January 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: it is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [R. 35 is GRANTED. Section nine of the parties' agreement entitled IMPORTANT LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY is part of the agreement and shall be given effect. The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to submit an amended scheduling Order to govern future proceedings within 21 days. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 1/20/2015.(MRS)cc: COR
April 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: ORDERED that Barbourville Diagnostic's Motion toDismiss Philips Medical's Counterclaim [R. 23 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 4/21/2014.(MRS)cc: COR
August 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Barbourville Diagnostics Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint [R. 5 is GRANTED (2) Barbourville Diagnostics' Amended Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint [R. 10 is DENIED as moot;(3) Philips M edical's Motion to Dismiss [R. 4 is GRANTED in part and DENIEDin part; (4) The claims for Negligent Repair, Negligent Hiring, Negligent Misrepresentation, and the General Claim are DISMISSED with prejudice; and(5) Philips Medical is DIRECTED to file in the record by Monday, August 19, 2013, evidence of the contractual agreements between it and Barbourville Diagnostic. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 08/16/2013.(MRS)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barbourville Diagnostic Imaging Center v. Philips Medical Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbourville Diagnostic Imaging Center
Represented By: Brad C. Freeman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Philips Medical Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Nicholas Charles Birkenhauer
Represented By: Todd VanDerVeer McMurtry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?