Miller v. USA

Miller v. USA

Petitioner:	Lee Murray Miller
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	6:2013cv07324
Filed:	December 2, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office:	London Office
County:	Laurel
Presiding Judge:	Hanly A. Ingram
Presiding Judge:	Danny C. Reeves
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 17, 2015	Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER as to Lee Murray Miller: 1. Defendant Lee Murray Millers motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [Record No. 80 shall be construed as a motion for leave to file a second or successive petition for collateral relief u nder 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to transfer that motion to the Sixth Circuit as a second or successive petition in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2244 and Rule 9 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the Uni ted States District Courts. 2. To the extent Miller's motion [Record No. 80 can be construed as a request for reconsideration of the Courts August 28, 2014 Judgment, his request is DENIED.. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 12/17/15.(MRS)cc: COR, Pro Se File r

Date Filed

Document Text

December 17, 2015

Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER as to Lee Murray Miller: 1. Defendant Lee Murray Millers motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [Record No. 80 shall be construed as a motion for leave to file a second or successive petition for collateral relief u nder 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to transfer that motion to the Sixth Circuit as a second or successive petition in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2244 and Rule 9 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the Uni ted States District Courts. 2. To the extent Miller's motion [Record No. 80 can be construed as a request for reconsideration of the Courts August 28, 2014 Judgment, his request is DENIED.. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 12/17/15.(MRS)cc: COR, Pro Se File r

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Lee Murray Miller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?