Brainard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
| John Brainard |
| Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston |
| 6:2014cv00110 |
| May 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| London Office |
| Pulaski |
| Danny C. Reeves |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Plaintiff John Brainard's motion for judgment [Record No. 40 is DENIED, 2. This case is REMANDED to Defendant Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston with instructions to conduct a full and fair review of Plain tiff John Brainard's claim for benefits consistent with this opinion. The defendant is directed to complete its review within ninety (90) days of this Order. 3. This case is STRICKEN from the Court's docket. 4. Each side shall bear his/its costs and expenses incurred in this action. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 3/24/16.(MRS)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's motion to compel discovery [Record No. 29 is GRANTED, in part, limited to requests pertaining to the defendant's conflict of interest and alleged bias as described above, but DENIED as to the remainder of the interrogatories. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 12/30/2014. (MRS)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
