Jackson Brown v. Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment et al
| Rhonda Kay Jackson Brown |
| Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment, John Davis, Matt Bettinelli-Olpin, Tyler Gillett and Lindsay Devlin |
| 6:2014cv00147 |
| June 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| London Office |
| Laurel |
| Karen K. Caldwell |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
OPINION & ORDER: 1. Plaintiff's motion to amend her complaint (DE 27 ) is GRANTED; 2. The Individual Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (DE 21 ) is GRANTED; 3. Defendant Fox's motion to dismiss f or failure to state a claim (DE 19 ) is GRANTED; 4. Defendants' motion to strike evidence (DE 32 ) is DENIED as moot; 5. Defendants' motion to strike portions of the amended complaint (DE 35 ) is DENIED as moot; 6. Plaintiff's m otion to deny Defendants' motion to strike evidence (DE 37 ) is DENIED as moot; 7. Plaintiff's motion to deny Defendants' motion to strike portions of the amended complaint (DE 40 ) is DENIED as moot; and 8. This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's Active Docket and a judgment shall be issued contemporaneously with this order. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 08/27/2015.(KJA)cc: COR, mailed paper copy to pro se filer
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
