McKnight v. Poteat

McKnight v. Poteat

Plaintiff:	Herman McKnight
Defendant:	Ron Poteat
Case Number:	6:2015cv00082
Filed:	May 11, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office:	London Office
County:	Laurel
Presiding Judge:	Karen K. Caldwell
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 30, 2017	Filing 57 OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 1) Classic Auto Body's motion in limine (DE 48) is DENIED as follows: a. the motion is DENIED as moot to the extent it seeks to exclude the testimony of Mc Knight and Bruce Hall regarding the costs of completing the restoration; and b. the motion is DENIED to the extent that it seeks to exclude the testimony of Hall regarding the reasonableness of the amounts that Classic Auto Body has charged for the restoration. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 11/30/2017.(RC)cc: COR
September 14, 2017	Filing 41 OPINION & ORDER: 1) The proper remedy for any breach by Classic Auto Body Restoration & Rods, Inc. of its agreement to restore the Firebird is the return of the Firebird to McKnight and the award of the cost of completing the restoration; 2) Defe ndant Classic Auto Body Restoration & Rods, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment (DE 38 ) is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part as follows: a) the motion is DENIED to the extent that Classic Auto Body asks the Court to dismiss McKnight's cla im for the return of the Firebird and the cost of completing the restoration; b) the motion is GRANTED to the extent that Classic Auto Body asks the Court to dismiss McKnight's claim for the following damages: 1) rescission of the contract;2) at torneys fees;3) prejudgment interest; and 4) any other damages other than the return of the Firebird and the cost of completing the restoration; and c) McKnight's claim for the damages in paragraph 2(b) above are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 9/14/17.(SYD)cc: COR

Date Filed

Document Text

November 30, 2017

Filing 57 OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 1) Classic Auto Body's motion in limine (DE 48) is DENIED as follows: a. the motion is DENIED as moot to the extent it seeks to exclude the testimony of Mc Knight and Bruce Hall regarding the costs of completing the restoration; and b. the motion is DENIED to the extent that it seeks to exclude the testimony of Hall regarding the reasonableness of the amounts that Classic Auto Body has charged for the restoration. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 11/30/2017.(RC)cc: COR

September 14, 2017

Filing 41 OPINION & ORDER: 1) The proper remedy for any breach by Classic Auto Body Restoration & Rods, Inc. of its agreement to restore the Firebird is the return of the Firebird to McKnight and the award of the cost of completing the restoration; 2) Defe ndant Classic Auto Body Restoration & Rods, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment (DE 38 ) is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part as follows: a) the motion is DENIED to the extent that Classic Auto Body asks the Court to dismiss McKnight's cla im for the return of the Firebird and the cost of completing the restoration; b) the motion is GRANTED to the extent that Classic Auto Body asks the Court to dismiss McKnight's claim for the following damages: 1) rescission of the contract;2) at torneys fees;3) prejudgment interest; and 4) any other damages other than the return of the Firebird and the cost of completing the restoration; and c) McKnight's claim for the damages in paragraph 2(b) above are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 9/14/17.(SYD)cc: COR

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McKnight v. Poteat
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Herman McKnight
Represented By:	Scott Marlow Webster
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Ron Poteat
Represented By:	John F. Kelley, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?