DIRECTV, LLC v. Fields et al
DIRECTV, LLC |
James Fields, Walkertown Cable Services, LLC, Altro T.V. Co., Inc., Brittany Fields and Daniel Boone Motor Inn, Inc. |
6:2015cv00093 |
May 26, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
London Office |
Perry |
David L. Bunning |
Cable/Satellite TV |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, Plaintiff DIRECTV, LLCs claims against Defendant Brittany Fields are voluntarily dismissed without prejudice; (2) Plaintiff DIRECTV, LLCs Motion for Partial Summary Judg ment (Doc. # 36 ) against Defendants James Fields, d/b/a Fields Cablevision; Walkertown Cable Services, LLC; and Daniel Boone Motor Inn, Inc. is GRANTED as to liability under § 605 (a) of the Telecommunications Act; (3) Plaintiff DIRECTV, LLCs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. #36) against Defendant Altro T.V. Co., Inc. is construed as a Motion for Default Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55, and so construed is GRANTED; (4) With respect to damages, an Evid entiary Hearing is set for 11/22/2017 11:00 AM in LONDON before Judge David L. Bunning; and (5) Clerk shall mail copy of MOO to James Fields, Walkertown Cable, Daniel Boone Motor Inn and Alto TV. Altro T.V. Co., Inc. (a Kentucky Corporation) and Brittany Fields terminated. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 10/2/17.(SYD)cc: COR, mailed as directed |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.