Carr et al v. Lake Cumberland Regional Hospital, LLC. et al
Plaintiff: Joseph Carr
Defendant: Lake Cumberland Regional Hospital, LLC. and John D. Husted
Case Number: 6:2015cv00138
Filed: July 31, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: London Office
County: Pulaski
Presiding Judge: Gregory F. VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 256 MEMORANDUM & ORDER: (1) The Hospital's Objection (Doc. # 197 ) to the Magistrate Judge's Order (Doc. # 188 ) is sustained in part and overruled in part, as stated in this Memorandum Order; and (2) The Hospital's Objection (Doc. # 232 ) to the Magistrate Judge's Order (Doc. # 217 ) is overruled. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 11/15/2017.(RBB)cc: COR
October 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 237 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) The Hospital's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on Plaintiff's negligent credentialing claims (Doc. # 100 ) is DENIED; (2) The Hospital's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on Plaintiff& #039;s negligence-per-se claims found in Counts Two and Three of the Complaint (Doc. # 100 ) is GRANTED; (3) Plaintiff's unopposed Motion to Supplement (Doc. # 138 ) is GRANTED; and (4) The Hospital's Motion for Summary Judgment on Count Five of the Complaint (Doc. # 112 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 10/31/2017.(KJA)cc: COR
March 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 82 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Lake Cumberland's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. # 39 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claim for negligent misrepresentation is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs other claims remain pending. Moti ons terminated: 39 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Lake Cumberland Regional Hospital, LLC. re Negligent Misrepresentation Claim filed by Lake Cumberland Regional Hospital, LLC. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 3/21/2017.(RBB)cc: COR
March 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Remand (Doc. # 6 ) is denied. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 03/07/2016.(KJA)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carr et al v. Lake Cumberland Regional Hospital, LLC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Carr
Represented By: Megan J. Hastings
Represented By: Ann B. Oldfather
Represented By: Megan J. Hastings
Represented By: Ann B. Oldfather
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lake Cumberland Regional Hospital, LLC.
Represented By: Heather Cash
Represented By: Chad Owens Propst
Represented By: Millicent A. Tanner
Represented By: Bryan Todd Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John D. Husted
Represented By: Bryan Todd Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?