Harris v. Goins et al
| Alberto Harris |
| William Goins, Patrick Robinson, Unlawful Narcotics Investigations, Treatment and Education, Inc., Cristina Little, Lonnie Philpot, George Stewart, Kevin Johnson, Manchester, KY City of, Clay County, Kentucky and John and Jane Does |
| 6:2015cv00151 |
| August 24, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| London Office |
| Clay |
| Danny C. Reeves |
| P SO |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
204
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Dfts' Bill of Costs 199 is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED in part. The Pla's objs to the dfts' BOC are sustained in part and overruled in part as explained w/in the Order; 2) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to tax as costs the following items: a) $2,597.15 for printed or electronically recorded transcripts necessarily obtained for use in the case; b) $541.80 for necessary copies; c) $62.78 for appearance of Harold Rader; d) 6;66.27 for the appearance of Kevin Johnson; e) $64.09 for the appearance of Jeff Culver; f) $41.94 for the appearance of Dan Smoot; 3) In summary, the taxable costs awarded to the moving dfts total $3,373.73. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 4/26/18.(MRS)cc: COR, Clerk of the Court
|
|
Filing
166
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. The defendants' motion to withdraw admissions and to strike exhibits [Record No. 122 is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, as moot, in part. 2. The defendants' duplicate motion to withdraw admissions and to str ike exhibits [Record No. 123 is DENIED, as moot. 3. The defendants' motion to strike witness list [Record No. 126 is DENIED, as moot. 4. The plaintiff's motion to exclude the testimony of Michael D. Bosse [Record No. 136 is DENIED.5. The plaintiff's motion to exclude witnesses [Record No. 138 is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part, consistent with this Memorandum Order and Opinion. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 9/14/17. (MRS) cc: COR
|
|
Filing
159
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Defendant Clay County, Kentucky's Motion for Summary Judgment [Record No. 82 is GRANTED. Plaintiff Alberto Harriss claims against Defendant Clay County, Kentucky are DISMISSED, with prejudice, in their entirety. 2. Plaintiff Alberto Harriss claims against Defendant George Stewart in hisindividual capacity are DISMISSED, with prejudice, in their entirety.3. Defendants William Goins, Patrick Robinson, Unlawful Narcotics InvestigationTreatment and Education, I nc. (UNITE) and the City of Manchester, Kentuckys Motion for Summary Judgment [Record No. 83 is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part, consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. a. Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of these defendants on Count II (Due Process), Count IV (Violations of Sixth Amendment) and Count VII (Monell Liability). b. Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of these defendants on all theories relating to the Sixth Amendment speedy trial/prolonged incarceration issue s otherwise pleaded in the Complaint. c. Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of these defendants onCount VIII (Emotional Distress). d. Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of these defendants on Count IX (Civil Conspiracy) with respect to theories o f outrage and negligence, and theories based on false arrest and/or prolonged incarceration. e. Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of these defendants onCount X (Negligence/Gross Negligence/Recklessness) with respect to the theory of negligence an d theories based on false arrest and/or prolonged incarceration. f. Summary Judgment is DENIED with respect to all remaining counts andtheories.4. Defendant Clay County, Kentuckys Motion to Join [Record No. 134 isDENIED as moot.5. A revised Scheduling Order will be entered separately.. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 7/20/17.(MRS)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Movant's 50 MOTION to Quash by Oscar House is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 08/26/16.(MRS)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Plaintiff Alberto Harris' motion for an extension of the deadlines contained in the Scheduling Order [Record No. 46 is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. 2. The deadline for completing discovery is extend ed through September 30, 2016. 3. The deadline for filing dispositive motions is extended through October 28, 2016. 4. All other deadlines contained in the Scheduling Order [Record No. 28 shall remain in place. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 08/11/2016. (MRS) cc: COR
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Defendant Unlawful Narcotics Investigations, Treatment and Education, Inc. (UNITE) has filed a motion to dismiss the claims that Plaintiff Alberto Harris has asserted against it. [Record No. 6 ] ORDERED: 1. Defendant UNITE's motion to dismiss [Record No. 6 ] is GRANTED with respect to the following claims and parties: a. the plaintiff's claims of constitutional violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in Count I, as they pertain to UNITE; b. the p laintiff's claims contained in Counts II through V, as they pertain to UNITE; and c. the plaintiff's claims contained in Count VII, as it pertains to UNITE. 2. Defendant UNITE' motion to dismiss [Record No. 6 ] is DENIED with resp ect to the remaining claims. Motions terminated: 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Unlawful Narcotics Investigations, Treatment and Education, Inc. filed by Unlawful Narcotics Investigations, Treatment and Education, Inc. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 12/29/2015.(RBB)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
