Osborne v. USA
Petitioner: Michael Osborne
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 6:2016cv00200
Filed: September 13, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: London Office
County: Laurel
Presiding Judge: Hanly A. Ingram
Presiding Judge: Danny C. Reeves
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. The Magistrate Judge's Recommended Disposition [Record No. 226 is ADOPTED and INCORPORATED by reference. 2. Defendant/Movant Michael Osborne's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [Record No. 212 is DISMISSED, with prejudice.. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 3/8/17.(MRS)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Osborne v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Osborne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?