Henley Mining, Inc. v. Parton
| Henley Mining, Inc. |
| David E. Parton |
| 6:2017cv00092 |
| April 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| London Office |
| Bell |
| Gregory F. VanTatenhove |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant's Motion in Limine [R. 57 ] is DENIED; 2. Plaintiff's Motions in Limine [R. 58 ; R. 59 ] is DENIED; 3. Plaintiff's Motion to Sustain Deposition Objection [R. 99 ] is DENIED. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 03/29/2021.(KJA)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [R. 56 ] is DENIED. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 08/03/2020.(KJA)cc: COR Modified text on 8/4/2020 (KJA).
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER 7 MOTION to Dismiss by David E. Parton : The Court hereby ORDERS Defendant David E. Partons Motion to Dismiss [R. 7] is DENIED. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 3/26/19.(SYD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Court's Order [R. 11 ] is GRANTED; 2. The Court's Order [R. 10 ] invoking Burford abstention is VACATED; 3. This action is RESTORED to the active docket; and 4. The Court shall reconsider Defendant David E. Parton's Motion to Dismiss. [R. 7 ]. A subsequent order reaching the merits of that motion shall issue at a later date. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 03/05/2019.(KJA)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: having considered the record, applicable law, and the arguments of the parties, the Court hereby ORDERS: 1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint is GRANTED [R. 7 ]; 2. This case will be stricken from the court's active docket; and 3. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 3/28/2018.(RBB)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Henley Mining, Inc. v. Parton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Henley Mining, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael D. Bowling |
| Represented By: | Gillard B. Johnson, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: David E. Parton | |
| Represented By: | Jason Trent Ams |
| Represented By: | Glenn Christopher Van Bever |
| Represented By: | Rachel A. Washburn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
