Harris v. McMillen et al
Catherine A. Harris |
ATS Specialized, Inc., Shelter General Insurance Company and Michael W. McMillen |
6:2017cv00216 |
August 3, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
London Office |
Laurel |
David L Bunning |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR Re: PDF DOCUMENT: Error: INCORRECT document attached to docket entry by docket clerk; Clerk failed to attach the Civil Cover Sheet; re #1 Notice of Removal, Correct document attached to this entry. cc: COR (Attachments: #1 State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(MRS) |
Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by ATS Specialized, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Anderson Trucking Services, Inc. for ATS Specialized, Inc. (MRS) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING REMOVAL by ATS Specialized, Inc., Michael W. McMillen (MRS) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Laurel Circuit Court, case number 17-CI-597. ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-3860972), filed by Michael W. McMillen, ATS Specialized, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record)(MRS) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/3/2017: #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (MRS). |
ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by ATS Specialized, Inc., Michael W. McMillen. (Attached the NOR #1 as part of the State Court Record #1 -1) (MRS) |
Conflict Check run. (MRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.