CK Franchising, Inc. v. SAS Services Inc.
Plaintiff: CK Franchising, Inc.
Defendant: SAS Services Inc.
Case Number: 6:2018cv00094
Filed: March 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: London Office
County: Pulaski
Presiding Judge: David L. Bunning
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 60 OPINION & ORDER : The Court GRANTS the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (DE # 51 ) and DENIES Defendant's opposing Motion (DE # 52 ), and AWARDS CKFI declaratory judgment as sought. A separate Judgment follows. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 7/10/19.(SYD)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CK Franchising, Inc. v. SAS Services Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CK Franchising, Inc.
Represented By: Janet P. Jakubowicz
Represented By: Christopher B. Madden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAS Services Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?