Land v. Mosley
Petitioner: Christopher Dean Land
Respondent: Jamie Mosley
Case Number: 6:2018cv00105
Filed: April 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: London Office
County: Laurel
Presiding Judge: Danny C. Reeves
Presiding Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM ORDER: 1. Land's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Record No. 1 is DENIED without prejudice to Lands right to assert his claim in a civil rights complaint. 2. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 4/6/18.(MRS)cc: COR, Pro Se Filer
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Land v. Mosley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Christopher Dean Land
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jamie Mosley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?