Heritage Foundation, Inc. v. Wasatch Railroad Contractors et al
| Heritage Foundation, Inc. |
| John E. Rimmasch and Wasatch Railroad Contractors |
| 6:2018cv00249 |
| September 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Claria Horn Boom |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Claria Horn Boom for review: re #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive pleading by John E. Rimmasch, Wasatch Railroad Contractors (RBB) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Claria Horn Boom for review: re #5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration by John E. Rimmasch, Wasatch Railroad Contractors (RBB) |
| Filing 10 REPLY BRIEF to #9 RESPONSE to #9 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by John E. Rimmasch, Wasatch Railroad Contractors. (Stilz, Robert) Modified on 11/9/2018 (RBB). |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration by John E. Rimmasch, Wasatch Railroad Contractors filed by Heritage Foundation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 Deft Letter of Termination, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Denying Mtn Compel Arbitration)(Crabtree, William) |
| NOTICE RE: DOCUMENT CONVERSION REQUIREMENT TO william Crabtree re #8 Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCP 7.1, #7 Response in Opposition to Motion; Error: the pleadings were scanned instead of converted into PDF format directly from the native word application. Use a scanner ONLY if you cannot electronically prepare your documents with a word processing software package and convert them to PDF format. No further action required by counsel. cc: COR (RBB) |
| Filing 8 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Heritage Foundation, Inc.. (Crabtree, William) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive pleading by John E. Rimmasch, Wasatch Railroad Contractors filed by Heritage Foundation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Crabtree, William) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive pleading by John E. Rimmasch, Wasatch Railroad Contractors (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Stilz, Robert) Modified on 10/5/2018 (RBB). |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration by John E. Rimmasch, Wasatch Railroad Contractors (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order)(Stilz, Robert) Modified to describe motion on 10/5/2018 (RBB). |
| Filing 4 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by John E. Rimmasch, Wasatch Railroad Contractors. (Stilz, Robert) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Robert C. Stilz III. #1 Notice of Removal, has been filed by Wasatch Railroad Contractors without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (RC) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from McCreary Circuit Court, case number 18-CI-00109. ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4178300), filed by John E. Rimmasch, Wasatch Railroad Contractors. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Civil Summonses and Certified Mail Receipts, #3 Return of Service by Ky Secretary of State, #4 Certification of State Court Record by McCreary Circuit Court Clerk)(RC) |
| Conflict Check run. (RC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
