Barron v. Casada et al
Plaintiff: Percy Barron
Defendant: M. Casada and J. King
Case Number: 6:2018cv00312
Filed: December 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: P SO
Referring Judge: Gregory F VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: 1. The Clerk of the Court shall mark the assigned case number on a form Civil Rights Complaint [EDKy Form 520] and send it to Barron. 2. Within twenty-eight (28) days, Barron must complete, sign and mail the complaint form to the Court. 3. Barrons motion to proceed in forma pauperis [R. #2 ] is DENIED. 4. Within twenty-eight (28) days, Barron must pay the $400.00 in filing andadministrative fees to the Clerk of the Court.5. The Court will dismiss this case for failure to prosecute if Barron does not take the required steps within the time permitted. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 2/1/19. (Attachments: #1 EDKY 520) (SYD)cc: MAILED TO pro se filer w/form
December 10, 2018 Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(KJA)
December 10, 2018 Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Percy Barron. ***Mailing envelope attached at DE #1. (KJA)
December 10, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Percy Barron, pro se. Motions referred to P SO. (KJA) Modified to state mailing envelope attached at DE #1 on 12/10/2018 (KJA).
December 10, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Percy Barron, pro se. Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support of Motion by Percy Barron, pro se, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 mailing envelope, front and back, postmarked December 6, 2018)(KJA)
December 10, 2018 Conflict Check run. (KJA)
December 10, 2018 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Percy Barron, #1 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Percy Barron (KJA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barron v. Casada et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Casada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Percy Barron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?