Cannon v. Warden of USP McCreary et al
| Gregory L. Cannon |
| Kizza and Warden of USP McCreary |
| 6:2019cv00113 |
| May 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| P SO |
| Robert E Wier |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER re #1 Complaint (Referred) filed by Gregory L. Cannon: 1. The Clerk SHALL docket DE #1 as a motion to amend the complaint in Cannon v. Kizza, et al., Case No. 6:19-cv-102-GFVT (E.D. Ky. 2019); and 2. The Court STRIKES this matter from the active docket. Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 5/8/19.(SYD)cc: mailed to pro se filer
|
| Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(KJA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT referred to PSO, filed by Gregory L. Cannon, pro se. (Attachments: #1 mailing envelope, front and back, postmarked 04/30/2019)(KJA) |
| Conflict Check run. (KJA) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Complaint (Referred) (KJA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
