Daniels v. South Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation
| Michael Daniels |
| South Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation |
| 6:2019cv00192 |
| August 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Gregory F VanTatenhove |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Gregory F. Van Tatenhove for review: re #6 MOTION to Remand by Michael Daniels (SYD) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Remand by Michael Daniels filed by South Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Denying Motion to Remand)(Owsley, Michael) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #6 MOTION to Remand by Michael Daniels filed by Michael Daniels. (Ramsey, Rhett) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Remand by Michael Daniels (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ramsey, Rhett) |
| Filing 5 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by South Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation identifying Corporate Parent South Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation for South Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation.. (Owsley, Michael) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by South Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation.(Owsley, Michael) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Michael A. Owsley. #1 Notice of Removal, has been filed by South Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (MM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Wayne Circuit Court, case number 19-CI-204. ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4434231), filed by South Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and State Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(MM) |
| Conflict Check run. (MM) |
| Clerk's Note: NOTICE OF MANDATORY ECF DIRECTED TO Mark David Goss entered in error by clerk. Notice has been deleted. (MM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Daniels v. South Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Daniels | |
| Represented By: | Rhett B. Ramsey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: South Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Mark David Goss |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Owsley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
