Stroud v. USA
USA |
Michael Stroud, Jr. |
6:2019cv00218 |
September 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
William O Bertelsman |
P SO |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 JUDGMENT: Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date, and pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Michael Stroud, Jr.'s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 [R. #1 ] is DENIED. Judgment is entered in favor of the Respondent with respect to all issues raised in this proceeding. 2. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 09/18/2019.(MM)cc: COR, pro se filer via US Mail |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Michael Stroud, Jr. is an inmate at the United States Penitentiary McCreary in Pine Knot, Kentucky. Proceeding without a lawyer, Stroud filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241.[R. #1 ]. In light of the foregoing analysis, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Stroud's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 [R. #1 ] is DENIED; 2. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket; and 3. The Court will enter a corresponding Judgment. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 09/18/2019.(MM)cc: COR, pro se filer via US Mail |
Filing 5 Habeas Corpus Filing fee received - $ 5.00, receipt number 6007809 (MM) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #5 Habeas Corpus Filing fee received - $ 5.00, receipt number 6007809 (MM) |
Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(MM) |
Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Michael Stroud, Jr., pro se. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Postmarked 9/6/2019)(MM) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael Stroud, Jr, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Envelope - Postmarked 9-6-2019)(MM) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (MM) |
Conflict Check run. (MM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stroud v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Michael Stroud, Jr. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.