Sizemore v. Manchester Square Associates, LLC. et al
Rebecca Sizemore |
Manchester Square Associates, LLC. and Wal-Mart East, L.P. |
6:2019cv00222 |
September 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Karen K Caldwell |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 CONVENTIONAL FILING received on behalf of Manchester Square Associates. Exhibit 4-Video of Fall are filed per re #11 Notice of Filing, #10 Response to Motion. (MAINTAINED ON THE SHELF IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE) (SYD) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Rebecca Sizemore filed by Wal-Mart East, L.P.. (Stevens, Thomas) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Amend/Correct by Rebecca Sizemore Complaint filed by Wal-Mart East, L.P.. (Stevens, Thomas) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Wal-Mart East, L.P.. (Stevens, Thomas) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF FILING by Manchester Square Associates, LLC. re #10 Response to Motion,, (Jackson, Gregory) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Rebecca Sizemore , #8 MOTION to Amend/Correct by Rebecca Sizemore Complaint filed by Manchester Square Associates, LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Manchester's Answers to Interrogatories, #3 Exhibit 3 - Plaintiff's Answers to Interrogatories, #4 Exhibit 4 - Photos, #5 Exhibit 5 - Plaintiff's Interrogatories & Requests, #6 Exhibit 6 - Contract with Capital Cleaning, #7 Exhibit 7 - Notice of Service)(Jackson, Gregory) |
Attorney Update. Attorney R. Scott Madden for Rebecca Sizemore added. (RBB) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Rebecca Sizemore (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sergent, Bryan) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Amend/Correct by Rebecca Sizemore Complaint (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit, #3 Proposed Order)(Sergent, Bryan) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rebecca Sizemore. (Sergent, Bryan) |
Filing 6 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wal-Mart East, L.P.. (Hardesty, John) |
Filing 5 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Manchester Square Associates, LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit-Copy of Statement)(Jackson, Gregory) Named Exhibit on 9/17/2019 (SYD). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by John L. Hardesty on behalf of Wal-Mart East, L.P. (Hardesty, John) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Gregory A. Jackson. #1 Notice of Removal, has been filed by Manchester Square Associates, LLC without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (MM) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Clay Circuit Court, case number 18-CI-219. ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4464373), filed by Manchester Square Associates, LLC.(Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #3 Exhibit 2 - Interrogatory Answer, #4 Exhibit 3 - Annual Report, #5 Exhibit 4 - State Court Record, #6 Proposed Order)(MM) |
Conflict Check run. (MM) |
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Manchester Square Associates, LLC. Filed in State Court Record - See #1 (MM) |
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Wal-Mart East, L.P. Filed in State Court Record - See #1 (MM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.