Richardson v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Cleo Richardson |
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. and Walmart Stores East |
6:2020cv00065 |
March 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Hanly A Ingram |
Robert E Wier |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER: TELEPHONE CONFERENCE set for 9/21/2020 at 11:00 AM in LONDON before Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram. The call will be off the record (based in London) and for counsel only. To join the teleconference, the parties are DIRECTED to call AT&T Teleconferencing as set forth in the order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 4/15/2020.(JMB)cc: COR |
Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: 1. The parties shall exchange initial Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures by April 15, 2020. The parties shall timely exchange supplemental information as required by Rule 26 (e). 2. Plaintiff shall file any motion to join parties or amend pleadings by July 15, 2020. Defendant shall file any motion to join parties or amend pleadings by August 14, 2020. 3. The parties shall complete all discovery by March 1, 2021. This deadline means, as relevant, service of written discovery calculated to secure a response by and compliant with the deadline. 4. Per Rule 26(a)(2), no later than November 16, 2020, Plaintiff shall disclose the identity of expert witnesses who may be used at trial, accompanied by written reports signed by the Rule 26(a)(2)(B) expert witnesses and/or written summaries consistent with Rule 26(a)(2)(C), as applicable, all in compliance with the rule. 5. No later than April 1, 2021, counsel for the parties shall file all dispositive motions6. In accordance with District Judge Wiers referral order (D.E. 4), the Court declines at this time to schedule a pretrial conference, trial, or deadlines for related filings. Upon resolution of any summary judgment motion or expiration of deadlines for same, Judge Wier will, as necessary and appropriate, set other deadlines (e.g. liminal and Daubert motions, pretrial filings) and schedule further proceedings. 7. The Court builds the case schedule based on party input. Modification of this schedule thus is disfavored and will only occur under the standards and mechanics of Rule 16 and/or Rule 6, as applicable. 8. Other than the agreed-upon discovery limits within the parties Rule 26(f) report, the default limits within the discovery rules apply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 4/15/2020.(JMB)cc: COR |
Filing 7 FIRST DISCLOSURES Rule 26(A)(1) by Cleo Richardson.(Bowling, Blake) |
Filing 6 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Adams, Jennifer) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Hanly A. Ingram for review: #6 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (MRS) |
Filing 5 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: 1) Within 21 days, PARTIES meet; 2) Within 14 days, file a joint status report containing: a) discovery plan; b) estimated time to file PT mots; c) whether the parties believe the matter is suitable for some form of ADR and proposed timing; d) estimate trial length and mutually convenience dates; e) Whether the parties consent to jurisdiction of a USMJ for all purposes (form attached). Rule 26 Meeting Report due as stated within the order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 3/19/20. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Proceed before MJ) (MRS) cc: COR, |
Filing 4 STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND REFERRAL ORDER: 1. At the outset, the Court reminds the parties that, under Rule 1, they share with the Court the duty to construe, administer, and employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action; 2. Pursuant to 28:636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court refers this case to the appropriate United States Magistrate Judge for this Division; 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court retains for decision any motion dispositive of a claim or defense (as well as motions regulating the trial proof, including Daubert and motions in limine); 4. Concurrent with the filing of any Rule 12 motion, the moving party may file, as a separate motion, any request for a discovery stay pending resolution. The Court refers consideration of any such motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge; 5. Discovery Disputes shall be resolved as defined within this order; The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter this Standing Order in the undersigned's civil cases excepting Social Security, pro se, and prisoner post-conviction matters at case opening (or as the Court otherwise directs). Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier. (RBB)cc: COR |
Filing 2 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. identifying Other Affiliate WSE Management, LLC, Other Affiliate WSE Investment, LLC, Other Affiliate Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Other Affiliate Wal-Mart, Inc. for Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (RBB) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Bell, case number 19-CI-402; ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4623891), filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Discovery Responses, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Record, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(RBB) |
ANSWER to (State Court) Complaint (Filed as an attachment to #1 Notice of Removal) by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (RBB) |
Conflict Check run. (RBB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.