Hawkins v. USA et al
| Colin Hawkins |
| J. Helton, Wade Thompson, USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Gregory Kizziah |
| 6:2020cv00135 |
| June 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| David L Bunning |
| P SO |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
MOTION for Extension of Time by Colin Hawkins, pro se. Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Postmarked 08/04/2020)(MM)
|
|
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time by Colin Hawkins (MM)
|
|
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (KJA)
|
|
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Colin Hawkins (KJA)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows: (1) The Clerk of the Court shall mark the assigned case number on a form Civil Rights Complaint [EDKY Form 520] and send it to Hawkins. The Clerk of the Court shall also send Hawkins (1) an Affidavit of Assets / In Forma Pauperis Application [Form AO-240] and (2) a Certificate of Inmate Account [EDKY Form 523]; (2) Should Hawkins wish to pursue his claims in this lawsuit, he must complete and file the complaint form, describing the facts of his case, specifically identifying the people, dates, places, and actions which are relevant to his claims, and explain what he wants the Court to do; (3) In addition, Hawkins must either pay the $400.00 filing and administrative fees or (1) have the Certificate of Inmate Account certified by prison staff, (2) complete the Affidavit of Assets/In Forma Pauperis Application, and (3) file both of them with the Court; (4) Hawkins must take these steps within 30 days from the date of this Order, or the case will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute; and (5) Within 30 days, Hawkins may also wish to file into the record the Standard Form 95 he filed with the Bureau of Prisons regarding the claims asserted in the complaintand the Bureau's denial of his request for administrative settlement, or a narrative explanation of his efforts to exhaust his FTCA claim. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 7/21/2020. (Attachments: #1 EDKy_520, #2 AO_240, #3 EDKy_523)(MM)cc: COR and Colin Hawkins by US Mail
|
|
Filing 6
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Colin Hawkins, pro se. Mailing envelope attached at DE #5 . (KJA)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Colin Hawkins, pro se. Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 Financial Affidavit of Colin Hawkins, #2 mailing envelope, front and back, postmarked 07/14/2020)(KJA)
|
|
Filing 3
IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 sample caption)(SYD)
|
|
Conflict Check run. (SYD)
|
|
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of pro se for review: #1 Complaint (Referred) (SYD)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT referred to Judge Pro Se, filed by Colin Hawkins, PRO SE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit In Support, #2 mailing envelope, front and back, postmarked 6/23/20)(SYD)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
