Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc. v. Smedley
Plaintiff: Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc.
Defendant: Michael W. Smedley doing business as Smedley Farms
Case Number: 6:2020cv00167
Filed: August 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Karen K Caldwell
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2020 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc. via personal service by Kentucky Process Service Inc. to Michael W. Smedley served on 8/11/2020, answer due 9/1/2020. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service)(KJA)
August 13, 2020 Filing 7 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc. (KJA)
August 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: The Court having considered the matter and being sufficiently advised, the #3 motion for admission pro hac vice is GRANTED. In the future, counsel is advised to attach a proposed order in accordance with the local rules. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 08/06/2020. (KJA)cc: COR - Order and ECF General Order and ECF Registration Form to Michael S. Kelley via US Mail
August 6, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Michael S. Kelley. #1 Complaint, has been filed by Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc. without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR Michael S. Kelley via US Mail. (KJA)
August 6, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Michael W. Smedley; Summons issued and returned to counsel by U.S. Mail (KJA)
August 6, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Michael S. Kelley to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Receipt Number 6008369)(KJA)
August 6, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 6008368), filed by Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Beck's Hybrids Commitment Rewards Multi-Year Contract, #3 Exhibit B - Promissory Note Between Beck's and Smedley Farms, #4 Receipt)(KJA) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/6/2020: #5 Summons as to Michael W. Smedley) (KJA).
August 6, 2020 Conflict Check run. (KJA)
August 6, 2020 BAR STATUS Check completed as to Michael S. Kelley re #3 MOTION for Michael S. Kelley to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc.. (KJA)
August 6, 2020 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Michael S. Kelley for review: re #3 MOTION for Michael S. Kelley to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc. (KJA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc. v. Smedley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael W. Smedley doing business as Smedley Farms
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc.
Represented By: Michael S. Kelley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?