NFINITYLINK Communications, Inc. v. City of Monticello, Kentucky et al
| NFINITYLINK Communications, Inc. |
| City of Monticello, Kentucky, Community Telecom Services and City Council of the City of Monticello, Kentucky |
| 6:2020cv00208 |
| October 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Karen K Caldwell |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 VERIFIED MOTION to Dismiss by City Council of the City of Monticello, Kentucky, City of Monticello, Kentucky, Community Telecom Services filed by NFINITYLINK Communications, Inc.. (Montague, William) |
| Filing 12 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by City Council of the City of Monticello, Kentucky, City of Monticello, Kentucky, Community Telecom Services. (Maclin, Robert) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by City Council of the City of Monticello, Kentucky, City of Monticello, Kentucky, Community Telecom Services.(Maclin, Robert) |
| Filing 10 VERIFIED MOTION to Dismiss by City Council of the City of Monticello, Kentucky, City of Monticello, Kentucky, Community Telecom Services (Maclin, Robert) |
Filing 9
ORDER FOR ADMISSION OF DANIEL P. REING PRO HAC VICE: Upon plaintiff's motion in compliance with Joint Local Rule 83.2, the Court being otherwise sufficiently advised, Daniel P. Reing is hereby GRANTED leave to appear pro hac vice on behalf of the Plaintiffs herein. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 11/18/2020. (MM)cc: COR and Daniel P. Reing by US Mail (w/ECF Registration Form)
|
| BAR STATUS Check completed as to Daniel P. Reing re #8 MOTION for Daniel P. Reing to Appear Pro Hac Vice by NFINITYLINK Communications, Inc. ( Filing fee $125; receipt number 0643-4829677). (MM) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Daniel P. Reing to Appear Pro Hac Vice by NFINITYLINK Communications, Inc. ( Filing fee $125; receipt number 0643-4829677) (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Daniel P. Reing, #2 Certificate of Good Standing - Virginia, #3 Certificate of Good Standing - District of Columbia, #4 Proposed Order)(Montague, William) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Affidavit of Service of Summons served on Community Telecom Services on 11/02/2020, filed by NFINITYLINK Communications, Inc.. (Montague, William) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Affidavit of Service of Summons served on City Council of the City of Monticello on 11/02/2020, filed by NFINITYLINK Communications, Inc.. (Montague, William) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Affidavit of Service of Summons served on City of Monticello on 11/02/2020, filed by NFINITYLINK Communications, Inc.. (Montague, William) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to City Council of the City of Monticello, Kentucky, City of Monticello, Kentucky, Community Telecom Services; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically (MM) |
| Filing 2 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by NFINITYLINK Communications, Inc.. (MM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4800734), filed by NFINITYLINK Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons City of Monticello, Kentucky, #3 Summons City Council of the City of Monticello, Kentucky, #4 Summons Community Telecom Services)(MM) |
| Conflict Check run. (MM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
