Privett v. Ford Motor Company
| Ford Motor Company |
| Michael B. Privett |
| 6:2020cv00226 |
| November 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Claria Horn Boom |
| Hanly A Ingram |
| Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all defendants, all dates and deadlines are VACATED, and this matter is STRICKEN from the Courts active docket, with each party to bear its own costs and fees. Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 6/17/21.(SYD)cc: COR
|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Claria H. Boom for review: re #15 Proposed Agreed Order of Dismissal, with Prejudice by Ford Motor Company (SYD) |
| Filing 15 Proposed Agreed Order of Dismissal, with Prejudice by Ford Motor Company. (Keal, R.) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the parties SHALL FILE an agreed order of dismissal on or before Monday, June 21, 2021. re D.E. #13 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 05/18/2021.(KJA)cc: COR
|
| Filing 13 MINUTE ENTRY ORDER FOR TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE held on 5/17/2021. before Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram: This matter was called for a telephonic conference with counsel participating as noted. The parties reported that a binding settlement agreement has been entered into, but payment has not been made. The parties indicated that an agreed order of dismissal could be filed by late June. No follow-up conference was deemed necessary. Signed by Hanly A. Ingram. (MM)cc: COR |
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Ford Motor Company of Service of Answers to Interrogatories, Responses to Requests for Production of Documents and Response to Request for Admission (Keal, R.) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE by Ford Motor Company of Service of Interrogatories and Requests for Production (Keal, R.) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: The Court, having reviewed paragraph 14 of the parties' proposed protective order (D.E. #7 at 6) CLARIFIES that a party seeking to file a sealed document must electronically file a motion for leave to seal pursuant to LR 5.6. In other words, the Court's approval of the proposed protective order does not pre-authorize sealing of any matter in the record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 01/27/2021.(KJA)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 9
AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER: See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 01/27/2021.(KJA)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: The Court HEREBY ORDERS that a TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE is set for 5/17/2021 at 11:00 AM in LONDON before Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram. The call will be off the record and for counsel only.To join the teleconference, the parties are DIRECTED to call AT&T Teleconferencing at 1-888-675-2535, to enter Access Code 8810053 (followed by "#"), and, when requested, enter the Security Code 20226 (followed by "#"). re #6 Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 01/27/2021.(KJA)cc: COR, London Diary
|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Hanly A. Ingram for review: re #7 Proposed Agreed Order Proposed Stipulated Protective Order by Michael B. Privett (KJA) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Agreed Order Proposed Stipulated Protective Order by Michael B. Privett. (Childers, Todd) |
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: 1) the following ddlns shall be observed: a) Initial disclosures by 2/8/2021. These need not be filed in the Court record; b) Discovery as stated. i. Fact Discovery by 9/3/2021; ii. Expert discovery 11/15/2021; c. Supplementation as stated. Supplemental disclosures & responses need not be filed in the Court record; d. Motions to join addl parties or amend pleadings by 9/13/2021; e. Identity of expert witnesses who may used at trial w/reports/summaries (i) from pla by 7/1/2021; (ii) dft by 8/1/2021; f. Dispositive motions by 12/30/2021, response and reply time per Rule. 2. Parties to observe FRCivP 5(d) directives; 3. FPTC before the undersigned on 5/24/2022 at 10:00 a.m. at London. 4. NLT 21 days prior to ptc, counsel shall file the filing: a. wit & exh list; b. motions in limine; c. evid depos to be used at trial; d. pt memo; e. proposed agreed jury instructions; 5. NLT 14 days before ptc: a. written objs; b. responses to motion in limine; c. responses to motion for ruling on obj. 6. At ptc, counsel shall be prepared to: a. make possible stipulations of admissibility; b. disclose demo or summary exhs; c. display all exhs to be used at trial; d. discuss possibility of settlement; e. advise Court of anticipated tech issues; 7. NLT 7 working days prior to trial counsel shall submit to Chambers a copy of each doc exh. 8. TRIAL BY JURY on 6/28/2022 at 9:30 a.m. at London. Counsel present by 9:00 a.m. Anticipated length 5 days. 9. Referred to MJ Hanly A. Ingram to: a. resolve all non-dispositive motions; b. manage discovery; c. manage pt sched issues; d. 2. Conduct mid-discovery telephonic conference; e. conduct settlement conference. 10. Discovery disputes as stated. 11. Modification of this schedule is unlikely & will occur only for good cause. Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 01/26/2021.(KJA)cc: COR, London Diary, Jury Clerk
|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Claria Horn Boom for review: #5 Status Report (KJA) |
| Filing 5 JOINT STATUS REPORT of parties planning meeting & proposed discovery plan by Michael B. Privett. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order)(Childers, Todd) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: 1. Within 21 days, parties shall meet to consider the topics Rule 26(f)(2) mandates. 2. Within 14 days of meeting, file joint status report. 3. Per FRCP 7.1 any party that has not already done so, shall file a Rule 7.1 disclosure statement at the time of the report. Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 12/14/2020. (Attachments: #1 MJ Consent Form)(KJA)cc: COR
|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Claria H. Boom for review: #1 Notice of Removal, (SYD) |
| Conflict Check run. (SYD) |
| Filing 2 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Ford Motor Company. (SYD) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Whitley Circuit Court, case number 20-CI-447filed by Ford Motor Company.( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4824785) (Attachments: #1 State Court Record Complaint, #2 State Court Record Answer, #3 State Court Record Answer to Request for Admissions by Def, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(SYD) |
| ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Ford Motor Company. Attached to the NOR as part of the State Court Record #1 -2 (SYD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Privett v. Ford Motor Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Executor: Michael B. Privett | |
| Represented By: | Todd K. Childers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
| Represented By: | R. Thaddeus Keal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
