Atwood v. Jagielski
| Casey D. Atwood |
| Brandon L. Jagielski |
| 6:2021cv00031 |
| March 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Hanly A Ingram |
| Robert E Wier |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Brandon L. Jagielski NOTICE OF SERVICE OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS (House, Jillian) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE by Brandon L. Jagielski NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES (House, Jillian) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF FILING Service of Rule 26 Disclosures by Casey D. Atwood (Reeves, Sarah) Modified text on 4/9/2021 (MM). |
Filing 9
ORDER: TELEPHONE CONFERENCE set for 7/9/2021 at 11:00 AM in LONDON before Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram. The call will be off the record and for counsel only.To join the teleconference, the parties are DIRECTED to call AT&TTeleconferencing as stated within the order.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 3/29/2021.(JMB)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: 1. The parties shall exchange initial Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures by April 7, 2021. 2. Plaintiff shall have up to and including November 30, 2021, in which to amend pleadings or to join parties. Defendant shall have up to and including January 4, 2022, in which to amend pleadings or to join parties. 3. Per Rule 26(a)(2), no later than November 14, 2021, Plaintiff shall disclose the identity of expert witnesses who may be used at trial, accompanied by written reports signed by the Rule 26(a)(2)(B) expert witnesses and/or written summaries consistent with Rule 26(a)(2)(C), as applicable, all in compliance with the rule. These disclosures need not be filed in the Court record. No later than December 21, 2021, Defendant shall provide same. Supplementation under Rule 26(e), if any, shall be made by January 31, 2022. 4. All non-expert written discovery shall be completed on or before October 16, 2021. The parties shall complete all expert discovery by January 31, 2022. 5. No later than March 1, 2022, counsel for the parties shall file all dispositive motions, with responses thereto in accordance with the local rules. 6. In accordance with District Judge Wiers referral order (D.E. 3), the Court declines at this time to schedule a pretrial conference, trial, or deadlines for related filings. 7. The Court builds the case schedule based on party input. Modification of this schedule thus is disfavored and will only occur under the standards and mechanics of Rule 16 and/or Rule 6, as applicable. 8. Other than the agreed-upon discovery limits within the parties Rule 26(f) report, the default limits within the discovery rules apply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 3/29/2021.(JMB)cc: COR
|
| Filing 7 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (House, Jillian) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Hanly A. Ingram for review: #7 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (SYD) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiffs motion for an extension of time (not assigned a separatedocket entry in this matter) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE but may be refiled ifneeded.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 3/11/2021. (JMB)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: 1. W/I 21 days parties meet. 2. W/I 14 days of meeting, file report containing a-e. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 3/2/21. (Attachments: #1 Consent form)(SYD)cc: COR
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING by Brandon L. Jagielski re #1 Notice of Removal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Filings)(House, Jillian) |
| ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Brandon L. Jagielski. Attached to the NOR as part of the State Court Record (SYD) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND REFERRAL ORDER: 1. At the outset, the Court reminds the parties that, under Rule 1, they share with the Court the duty to construe, administer, and employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action; 2. Pursuant to 28:636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court refers this case to the appropriate United States Magistrate Judge for this Division; 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court retains for decision any motion dispositive of a claim or defense (as well as motions regulating the trial proof, including Daubert and motions in limine); 4. Concurrent with the filing of any Rule 12 motion, the moving party may file, as a separate motion, any request for a discovery stay pending resolution. The Court refers consideration of any such motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge; 5. Discovery Disputes shall be resolved as defined within this order; The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter this Standing Order in the undersigned's civil cases excepting Social Security, pro se, and prisoner post-conviction matters at case opening (or as the Court otherwise directs). Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier. (SYD)cc: COR
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Whitley Circuit Court, case number 20-CI-299, filed by Brandon L. Jagielski. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number 0643-4910703) (Attachments: #1 State Court Record)(SYD) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/4/2021: #2 State Court Record) (SYD). |
| MOTION for Extension of Time To Answer Interrogatories, Requests for Production of Documents, and Requests for Admissions by Casey D. Atwood. Attached to the NOR as part of the State Court Record Motions referred to Hanly A. Ingram. (SYD) |
| Attorney Update. Attorney Gregg E. Thornton,Betsy Ryan Catron for Brandon L. Jagielski added. (SYD) |
| Conflict Check run. (SYD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Atwood v. Jagielski | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Casey D. Atwood | |
| Represented By: | Sarah Tipton Reeves |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey R. Tipton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Brandon L. Jagielski | |
| Represented By: | Betsy Ryan Catron |
| Represented By: | Gregg E. Thornton |
| Represented By: | Jillian Dove House |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
