Chapman v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Larry Darnell Chapman
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Case Number: 6:2021cv00080
Filed: May 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Karen K Caldwell
Referring Judge: Joseph M Hood
2 Judge: Hanly A Ingram
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: (1) Each party shall bear its own costs and fees; (2) All claims against the Defendants in this case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (3) All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT; and (4) The Clerk shall STRIKE THIS MATTER FROM THE COURT'S ACTIVE DOCKET. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 6/4/2021.(MM)cc: COR
June 4, 2021 Filing 12 STIPULATION of Dismissal Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice by Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, C R Bard Incorporated. (Davis, Megan)
June 4, 2021 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Joseph M. Hood for review: #12 Stipulation of Dismissal (SYD)
May 19, 2021 Attorney Update. Attorney Richard B. North, Jr terminated. (SYD)
May 18, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE by Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, C R Bard Incorporated of Substitution of Counsel (Bird, Melissa)
May 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED as follows: (1) Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this Order, the parties, by counsel, shall meet, either in person or by telephone, to discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case, to make or arrange for the disclosures. (2) Within ten (10) days after the meeting the parties shall file a joint status report. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 05/13/2021.(KJA)cc: COR
May 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Pursuant this Court's General Order, the Court hereby ORDERS that this matter is REASSIGNED to Judge Joseph M. Hood for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 05/10/2021.(KJA)cc: COR
May 10, 2021 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Joseph M. Hood for review: #8 Order Reassigning Case, #1 Complaint (KJA)
May 7, 2021 Filing 7 CERTIFIED COPY of FINALIZED MDL No. 2641 CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER: the actions on this remand order be remanded to their respective transferor courts. NOTE: Please see Master Docket Sheet in United States District Court at Arizona Number 2:15-md-2641 for individual documents related to this MDL (Attachments: #1 MDL 2641 Docket, #2 Case Management Order 47, #3 Amended Case Management Order 50)(STC)
May 7, 2021 Filing 5 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Arizona. Case number 2:18-cv-04151. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. cc: COR w/ docket sheet
May 7, 2021 Conflict Check run. (STC)
May 6, 2021 Remark: Transferring Case to the Eastern District of Kentucky via electronic transfer. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) [Transferred from azd on 5/7/2021.]
April 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 AMENDED FINAL SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER. See Order for Details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 4/26/21. (MAP) [Transferred from azd on 5/7/2021.]
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 *Amended by Doc. #4 --FINAL SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER. See Order for Details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 4/20/21. (MAP) Modified on 4/29/2021 (SJF). [Transferred from azd on 5/7/2021.]
November 20, 2018 Filing 2 This case has been assigned to the Honorable David G. Campbell, with member case number: CV-18-4151-PHX-DGC. This case is included in MDL-2641. All future pleadings or documents should be filed in the Lead Case: 2:15-md-2641-DGC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) [Transferred from azd on 5/7/2021.]
November 20, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16218861 filed by Larry Darnell Chapman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MAP) [Transferred from azd on 5/7/2021.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chapman v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larry Darnell Chapman
Represented By: Russell W. Budd
Represented By: Sindhu Daniel
Represented By: Laura J. Baughman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated
Represented By: Richard B. North, Jr.
Represented By: Megan Basham Davis
Represented By: Melissa Foster Bird
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Represented By: Richard B. North, Jr.
Represented By: Megan Basham Davis
Represented By: Melissa Foster Bird
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?