Andrada v. Defendants Unknown
| Francisco Israel Andrada |
| Defendants Unknown |
| 6:2021cv00153 |
| September 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| P SO |
| Gregory F VanTatenhove |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. Andrada's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED without prejudice. 2. This a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay.. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 10/26/21.(JLC)cc: CORand Francisco Israel Andrada by US Mail
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS ORDERED: 1. Andrada's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED without prejudice. 2. Matter is STRICKEN from the docket.. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 10/26/21.(JLC)cc: CORand Francisco Israel Andrada by US Mail
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: 1. Clerk send EDKy 521; AO 240 and EDKY Form 523; 2. W/I 30 days Andrada complete and file petition form;3. W/I 30 days Andrada pay fee or file 240, awa 523; 4. Andrada advised failure to comply may result in dismissal. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 9/21/21.(SYD)cc: Francisco Israel Andrada by US Mail w/forms. Modified on 9/21/2021 (SYD).
|
| Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(JLC) |
| Filing 3 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Virginia Eastern. Case number 3:21-cv-00564. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received electronically. cc: Francisco Israel Andrade via US Mail |
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Transferring Action)- the action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 9/10/21. Copy of Order mailed to Petitioner. (adun, ) [Transferred from vaed on 9/10/2021.]
|
| Conflict Check run. (MRS) |
| Case transferred to District of Eastern Kentucky. (adun, ) [Transferred from vaed on 9/10/2021.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Francisco Israel Andrada. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(adun, ) [Transferred from vaed on 9/10/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Andrada v. Defendants Unknown | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Francisco Israel Andrada | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Defendants Unknown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
