Ostrum v. Gilley
Bobby Lee Ostrum |
J. Gilley |
6:2022cv00004 |
January 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Claria Horn Boom |
P SO |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Habeas Petition filing fee Filing fee received - $ 5, receipt number 6009415 (JLC) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #9 Filing Fee Received (JLC) |
Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME: 1. Motion for an extension of time re #7 is GRANTED.2. Ostrum must pay the $5.00 filing fee to Clerk within 21 days from date of this Order. If not, Court will deny petition without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a Court Order. Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 2/16/22.(JLC)cc: CORand Bobby Lee Ostrum, Pro Se by US Mail |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF FILING requesting extension of filing fee payment deadline by Bobby Lee Ostrum, Pro Se. (First lines of document illegible. Document was damaged and taped back together prior to Clerk receiving in mail.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope postmarked 2/9/22)(JLC) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #7 Notice of Filing, (JLC) |
Filing 6 ORDER re #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: 1. Ostrum's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [R. 3] is DENIED. 2. Ostrum must pay the $5.00 filing fee to the Clerk of the Court within 30 days from the date of this Order. If he fails to do so, the Court will deny his petition without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 1/12/2022. (MM)cc: COR and Bobby Lee Ostrum by US Mail |
Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(JLC) |
Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Bobby Lee Ostrum, Pro Se. (JLC) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bobby Lee Ostrum, Pro Se. Motions referred to P SO. (JLC) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Bobby Lee Ostrum, Pro Se. (Attachments: #1 Envelope postmarked 1/7/22)(JLC) |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bobby Lee Ostrum, Pro Se. (JLC) |
Conflict Check run. (JLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ostrum v. Gilley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Bobby Lee Ostrum | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: J. Gilley | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.