Williams v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Mary Williams
Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Case Number: 6:2022cv00007
Filed: January 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Hanly A Ingram
Referring Judge: Robert E Wier
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER:Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Additional Time for Responsive Pleading to Complaint #13 is GRANTED. Defendant shall have until March 25, 2022 to file responsive pleading.Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 3/11/22. (JLC)cc: COR
March 11, 2022 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Hanly A. Ingram for review: re #13 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company , Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company's Unopposed Motion for Additional Time for Responsive Pleading to Plainti (JMB)
March 10, 2022 Filing 13 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company , Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company's Unopposed Motion for Additional Time for Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint Motions referred to Hanly A. Ingram. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(von Schleicher, Warren)
March 8, 2022 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Hanly A. Ingram for review: re #12 JOINT MOTION to Substitute Party by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company MOTION by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company MOTION to Amend/Correct by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company , Joint Motion for Substitution of Aetna as Defendant, Voluntary Dismissal of Hartford, and to Amend the Case Caption (JMB)
March 7, 2022 Filing 12 JOINT MOTION to Substitute Party by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company , MOTION by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company , MOTION to Amend/Correct by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company , Joint Motion for Substitution of Aetna as Defendant, Voluntary Dismissal of Hartford, and to Amend the Case Caption Motions referred to Hanly A. Ingram. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(von Schleicher, Warren)
February 14, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR Re: PDF DOCUMENT: Error: INCOMPLETE document attached to docket entry by docket clerk; Clerk omitted attaching Magistrate Judge Consent Form on original entry. re #10 Order For Meeting and Report ; Correct document attached to this entry. *JLC* cc: COR (Attachments: #1 Consent to Magistrate Judge Form)(JLC)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT:1. Within 21 days, counsel shall conduct Rule 26(f) Meeting.2. Within 14 days of the meeting, parties shall file a joint status report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 2/14/22.(JLC)cc: COR
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: Court HEREBY GRANTS Defendant's motion #5 for Warren Sebastian von Schleicher to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 2/14/22. (JLC)cc: COR Modified text on 2/14/2022 (JLC).
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 AGREED ORDER: IT IS ORDERED:Defendant shall have until March 11, 2022 to file responsive pleading to Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 2/14/22.(JLC)cc: COR
February 14, 2022 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Hanly A. Ingram for review: re #5 MOTION for Warren Sebastian von Schleicher to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5189993), #6 Proposed Agreed Order and Stipulation for Additional Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiff's Complaint by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (JMB)
February 14, 2022 BAR STATUS Check completed as to Warren von Schleicher re #5 MOTION for Warren Sebastian von Schleicher to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5189993). (JMB)
February 11, 2022 Filing 7 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., Corporate Parent Hartford Holdings, Inc. for Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company.. (von Schleicher, Warren)
February 11, 2022 Filing 6 Proposed Agreed Order and Stipulation for Additional Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiff's Complaint by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(von Schleicher, Warren)
February 11, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION for Warren Sebastian von Schleicher to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5189993)Motions referred to Hanly A. Ingram. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Warren Sebastian von Schleicher, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit C - Proposed Order)(von Schleicher, Warren)
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND REFERRAL ORDER: 1. At the outset, the Court reminds the parties that, under Rule 1, they share with the Court the duty to construe, administer, and employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action; 2. Pursuant to 28:636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court refers this case to the appropriate United States Magistrate Judge for this Division; 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court retains for decision any motion dispositive of a claim or defense (as well as motions regulating the trial proof, including Daubert and motions in limine); 4. Concurrent with the filing of any Rule 12 motion, the moving party may file, as a separate motion, any request for a discovery stay pending resolution. The Court refers consideration of any such motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge; 5. Discovery Disputes shall be resolved as defined within this order; The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter this Standing Order in the undersigned's civil cases excepting Social Security, pro se, and prisoner post-conviction matters at case opening (or as the Court otherwise directs). Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 11/13/19.(JLC)cc: COR
January 13, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically. (JLC)
January 13, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5167579), filed by Mary Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company)(JLC)
January 13, 2022 Conflict Check run. (JLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Williams
Represented By: Karl Cody Allison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Represented By: Warren von Schleicher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?