Gay v. Ray
Petitioner: Jason T. Gay
Respondent: H.L. Ray
Case Number: 6:2022cv00012
Filed: January 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Claria Horn Boom
Referring Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 JUDGMENT : 1. Jason Gays Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, [R. 1], is DISMISSED.2. This is a FINAL Judgment. Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 2/2/22.(SYD)cc: Jason Thomas Gay by US Mail
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER : 1. Jason Gays Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, [R. 1], is DISMISSED.2. This action is STRICKEN from the docket. Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 2/2/22.(SYD)cc: Jason Thomas Gay by US Mail
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: 1. denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. 2. The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this Order to the warden of the institution in which Gay is currently confined. 3. Gays custodian shall send the Clerk of the Court payment of the $5.00 filing fee. Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 2/1/22. (SYD)cc: Warden and Jason Thomas Gay by US Mail
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample caption)(SYD)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of pro se for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (SYD)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of pro se for review: re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jason T. Gay (SYD)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Conflict Check run. (SYD)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jason T. Gay, pro se. (SYD)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jason T. Gay, pro se. Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 mailing envelope, front and back, postmarked 1.26.22)(SYD)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jason T. Gay, pro se. (Attachments: #1 mailing envelope, front and back, postmarked 1/26/22)(SYD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gay v. Ray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jason T. Gay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: H.L. Ray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?