Taylor v. Gilley
| Elmer Keith Taylor |
| Warden J. Gilley |
| 6:2022cv00117 |
| June 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| William O Bertelsman |
| P SO |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
MOTION for Extension of Time by J. Gilley Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Gentry, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 6
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT to US Atty, EDKY re #4 Order. (SYD)
|
|
Filing 5
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT to Warden, J. Gilley re #4 Order. (JMB)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: 1. The Clerks Office shall send a copy of Taylor's petition [R. #1 ] and this Order by certified mail to both (a) Respondent J. Gilley, Warden at the USP McCreary in Pine Knot, Kentucky, and (b) the U.S. Attorney's Office for the EDKy. 2. Within 60 days from the entry of this Order, the Respondent MUST file a response to Taylors petition. The response shall be in the form of a memorandum addressing the factual allegations and legal claims contained in the petition; neither a formal motion to dismiss nor a motion for summary judgment is appropriate for these proceedings. The Respondent shall also attach any relevant documentary evidence to the response brief. 3. Finally, Taylor must promptly inform the Court, in writing, of any change in his mailing address. If Taylor fails to do so, the Court may dismiss his case. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 06/17/2022.(KJA)cc: COR, Warden Gilley and U.S. Attorney EDKy via certified mail, and Elmer Keith Taylor by US Mail (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/17/2022: #1 Copy of Certified Mail Envelopes) (KJA).
|
|
Filing 3
IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(MM)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $5 receipt number 600000051.), filed by Elmer Keith Taylor, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Attachment in Support, #2 Receipt, #3 Envelope postmarked 6/8/2022)(MM)
|
|
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (MM)
|
|
Conflict Check run. (MM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Taylor v. Gilley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Elmer Keith Taylor | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden J. Gilley | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Lee Gentry, AUSA |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
