Jones et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Abbie Jones and Christian Jones |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
6:2022cv00119 |
June 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Claria Horn Boom |
Hanly A Ingram |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle ( |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 AGREED ORDER: 1.The Agreed Order and Binding Stipulation [R. 6] is GRANTED. 2.This matter is REMANDED to the Harlan Circuit Court of the Commonwealth ofKentucky for further litigation activity. This matter is STRICKEN from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 7/1/2022.(MM)cc: COR |
Filing 6 Proposed Agreed Order 22-CV-00119 by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Banks, Darrin) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Claria H. Boom for review: re #6 Proposed Agreed Order 22-CV-00119 by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (SYD) |
Filing 5 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: (1) Within 21 days, the parties, by counsel, shall meet, either in person or by telephone, to consider the topics Rule 26(f) (2) mandates. (2) Within 14 days of the meeting, the parties shall file a joint status report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 06/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 AO 85 MJ Consent Form)(KJA)cc: COR |
Filing 4 STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND REFERRAL ORDER: 1. At the outset, the Court reminds the parties that, under Rule 1, they share with the Court the duty to construe, administer, and employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action; 2. Pursuant to 28:636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court refers this case to the appropriate United States Magistrate Judge for this Division; 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court retains for decision any motion dispositive of a claim or defense (as well as motions regulating the trial proof, including Daubert and motions in limine); 4. Concurrent with the filing of any Rule 12 motion, the moving party may file, as a separate motion, any request for a discovery stay pending resolution. The Court refers consideration of any such motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge; 5. Discovery Disputes shall be resolved as defined within this order; The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter this Standing Order in the undersigned's civil cases excepting Social Security, pro se, and prisoner post-conviction matters at case opening (or as the Court otherwise directs). Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom. (KJA)cc: COR |
Conflict Check run. (KJA) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Hanly A. Ingram for review: #1 Notice of Removal. (KJA) |
Filing 2 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (KJA) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Harlan Circuit Court, case number 22-CI-00038. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5289259), filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Policy Declarations, #4 Exhibit D - Answer of State Farm, #5 Exhibit E - Plaintiff Abbie Jones Answers to Interrogatories from State Farm, #6 Exhibit F - Plaintiff Christian Jones Answers to Interrogatories from State Farm, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(KJA) |
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Filed as part of the NOA at #1 -4. (KJA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.