Anglin v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Sheila Anglin
Defendant: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson & Johnson and Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2022cv00146
Filed: August 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Hanly A Ingram
Referring Judge: Robert E Wier
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2022 Filing 8 CERTIFIED ORDER received from District of New Jersey re: Case Transfer to the MDL Panel pursuant to CTO No. 32 filed in MDL Case Number 2973 (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(STC)cc: COR
August 19, 2022 Clerk's Note: Case extracted and transferred electronically via CM/ECF re #8 CTO-32. (STC)
August 19, 2022 Clerk's Note: JPMDL information extracted re #8 Case Transferred to MDL and electronically transmitted to AO. (SKV)
August 19, 2022 Clerk's Note: Case opened in District of New Jersey as 2:22-cv-05110 re #8 CTO-32. (STC)
August 18, 2022 Filing 7 INFORMATION COPY OF MDL CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER: MDL No. 2973. (KJA)
August 4, 2022 Clerk's Note re #1 Complaint: Possible MDL tag-along case. Clerk notified MDL Panel by email that an MDL case was listed as a related case on the civil cover sheet. (APR)
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND REFERRAL ORDER: 1. At the outset, the Court reminds the parties that, under Rule 1, they share with the Court the duty to construe, administer, and employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action; 2. Pursuant to 28:636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court refers this case to the appropriate United States Magistrate Judge for this Division; 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court retains for decision any motion dispositive of a claim or defense (as well as motions regulating the trial proof, including Daubert and motions in limine); 4. Concurrent with the filing of any Rule 12 motion, the moving party may file, as a separate motion, any request for a discovery stay pending resolution. The Court refers consideration of any such motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge; 5. Discovery Disputes shall be resolved as defined within this order; The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter this Standing Order in the undersigned's civil cases excepting Social Security, pro se, and prisoner post-conviction matters at case opening (or as the Court otherwise directs). Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 11/13/2019.(APR)cc: COR
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF RECUSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judge Claria Horn Boom RECUSES from this matter. The Court hereby DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to reassign the case by random draw to another Judge accepting cases on the London docket pursuant to the General Order governing case assignment. Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 8/3/2022.(APR)cc: COR
August 3, 2022 Conflict Check run. (APR)
August 3, 2022 Judge Robert E. Wier added. Judge Claria Horn Boom no longer assigned to case. (APR)
August 2, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson & Johnson, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically (Attachments: #1 Summons - Janssen Ortho, LLC, #2 Summons - Johnson & Johnson, #3 Summons - Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.)(APR)
August 2, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5326596) filed by Sheila Anglin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., #3 Summons - Janssen Ortho LLC, #4 Summons - Johnson & Johnson, #5 Summons - Teva Branded Pharmaceutical)(APR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anglin v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheila Anglin
Represented By: Richard Hay
Represented By: Sarah Hay Knight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Janssen Ortho LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?