Banner v. B.O.P.
| Homer Banner |
| B.O.P. |
| 6:2022cv00160 |
| August 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| P SO |
| Gregory F VanTatenhove |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: denying #6 Motion for Immediate Release by Homer Banner. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 9/16/2022. (JMB)cc: COR and Homer Banner by US Mail
|
|
Filing 5
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the Order of Dismissal entered today, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Petitioner Homer Banner's construed petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 [R. 1] is DENIED without prejudice; 2. This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket; 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause fordelay. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 9/12/2022.(MM)cc: CORand Homer Banner by US Mail
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: 1. Banner's letter, docketed as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 for administrative purposes [R. 1], is DENIED without prejudice; 2. The Court will enter an appropriate Judgment; and 3. This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 9/12/2022.(MM)cc: CORand Homer Banner by US Mail
|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #6 MOTION for Immediate Release by Homer Banner (KJA) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Immediate Release by Homer Banner, pro se. Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Various Attachments, #2 Cover Letter, #3 mailing envelope, front and back, postmark unknown)(KJA) Modified motion text on 9/13/2022 (KJA). |
| Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(APR) |
| Conflict Check run. (APR) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (APR) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Homer Banner, pro se. NO IFP MOTION, FEE NOT PAID. (Attachments: #1 Various Attachments in Support, #2 Mailing envelope, front and back, postmarked 8/25/2022)(APR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Banner v. B.O.P. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Homer Banner | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: B.O.P. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
