Proctor v. Gilley et al
| Marcus A. Proctor |
| T. Gilley, H. Ray, T. Bowles and Bigelow |
| 6:2022cv00198 |
| October 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Danny C Reeves |
| P SO |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Letter and USCA Case Number 22-6022 Case Manager Leon T. Korotko for #12 Notice of Appeal filed by Marcus A. Proctor. (KJA)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER: 1. The Clerk of this Court is directed to send Proctor a Sixth Circuit Form 4 and a Certificate of Inmate Account Form [E.D. Ky. 523 Form]. 2. Proctor must either pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee to the Clerk of this Court or complete the following steps to pursue pauper status on appeal: a. complete the Sixth Circuit Form 4; b. have prison staff complete and sign the Certificate of Inmate Account Form [E.D. Ky. 523 Form]; and c. file both documents with the Court. Proctor must take these steps within 30 days, or his appeal may be dismissed. 3. The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 11/21/2022.(MM)cc: COR, 6CCA, Marcus A. Proctor (w/ EDKY 523 Form) via U.S. Mail
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #10 Memorandum Opinion & Order, #11 Judgment, by Marcus A. Proctor, pro se. No filing Fee Collected (SHORT RECORD MAILED). cc: COR, 6CCA (Attachments: #1 Envelope postmarked 11/9/2022)(MM)
|
|
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Danny C. Reeves for review: #12 Notice of Appeal (MM)
|
|
Filing 11
JUDGMENT: 1. Plaintiff Marcus Proctor's Complaint [Record No. #1 ] is DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the docket.3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment, and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 10/26/2022.(KJA)cc: COR and Marcus A. Proctor by US Mail
|
|
Filing 10
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Proctor's Complaint [Record No. #1 ] is DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the docket. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 10/26/2022.(KJA)cc: COR and Marcus A. Proctor by US Mail
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: 1. Plaintiff Proctor's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Record No. #3 ] is GRANTED. Payment of the $52.00 administrative fee is WAIVED. 2. Plaintiff Proctor must pay the $350.00 filing fee. 3. Payment of an initial partial filing fee is DEFERRED because Plaintiff Proctor's financial records indicate that he currently lacks the assets to pay such a fee. 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to open an account in Plaintiff Proctors name for receipt of the filing fee. The Clerk shall complete a Notice of Payment Form [E.D. Ky. 525 Form] and then send a copy of this Order and the Notice of Payment Form to the Warden of the institution where Proctor is currently confined. 5. Plaintiff Proctor's custodian is directed to send the Clerk of this Court a payment each month from his inmate trust fund account. The payment should be in an amount equal to 20% of Proctor's income from the preceding month. However, the custodian shall only send a monthly payment if the amount in Proctor's account exceeds $10.00. The custodian shall continue the monthly payments until Proctor's entire $350.00 filing fee is paid. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 10/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 EDKy Form 525) (KJA)cc: COR, Finance, Order and Form to Oxford, FCI Warden and Marcus A. Proctor by US Mail
|
|
Filing 8
IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail along with a courtesy copy of the current docket sheet. (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(KJA) Modified text on 10/25/2022 (KJA).
|
|
Filing 6
CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Kentucky Western. Case number 5:22-cv-00107. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received electronically. cc: Plaintiff w/ copy of docket sheet.
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER. The Court transfers this case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Southern Division at London, for all further proceedings. The parties should direct all future filings to that Court. cc: Plaintiff (pro se), EDKY (JM) [Transferred from kywd on 10/25/2022.]
|
|
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (CBD)
|
|
Conflict Check run. (CBD)
|
|
Filing 4
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re DN #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marcus A. Proctor. (CDL) [Transferred from kywd on 10/25/2022.]
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Marcus A. Proctor. (CDL) [Transferred from kywd on 10/25/2022.]
|
|
Filing 2
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton. (CDL) [Transferred from kywd on 10/25/2022.]
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Bigelow, T. Bowles, T. Gilley, and H. Ray (No filing fee paid), filed by Marcus A. Proctor.(Attachments: #1 Summons Tendered) (CDL) [Transferred from kywd on 10/25/2022.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
